Your tenants inspect. RapidEye reviews. The tenant records a guided walkthrough on their own phone, on their own schedule. RapidEye compares it against that unit's own move-in baseline and hands your team a result instead of a submission.
Built for property management companies adding doors. No site visit, no review queue.
Illustrative result view.
Inspections are not hard. Inspections are the thing capping your growth. Every one of them ends with a person opening something and deciding what it means.
Every inspection needs a person on site, so door count and headcount move together.
Access is the real bottleneck. A twenty-minute walkthrough becomes a two-week thread with a tenant who works during your business hours.
Move-out disputes get settled by whatever someone happened to photograph, not by what the unit actually looked like at move-in.
Skipping the mid-lease on a good tenant is a decision you find out about at move-out, when it is expensive.
Handing capture to the tenant moves the work, it does not remove it. Someone on your team still opens every submission and decides what is damage and what is wear.
This is what "we moved inspections to the tenant" looks like on Friday morning.
Tenant-guided inspection tools take the work off your staff and put capture in the tenant's hands. That is a real advance and it solves the site visit. Then the work comes back: the submission lands in a queue and a manager opens every one of them.
That review step scales linearly with doors, which is the exact thing you were paying to escape. Two hundred units is a manageable Friday. Six hundred is a job.
RapidEye takes the review. Damage separated from normal wear, judged against that specific unit's own move-in baseline rather than a generic checklist, with timestamped evidence attached to every finding. Your team opens a result, not a submission, and spends its attention on the handful of units that actually need a decision.
Property managers who moved to tenant-performed inspections were not chasing a different camera. They were trying to get a person out of the loop.
"We had the ultimate goal of offloading some of our inspections onto tenants."
Jessica VanCloyd, General Manager, ODP
The tenant can shoot the unit. The tenant cannot tell you whether the mark on the countertop was there at move-in, whether the ceiling stain is new, or whether any of it is chargeable. Those are the questions that make an inspection worth doing, and they are the ones that land back on your desk.
RapidEye answers them before the file reaches your team. That is the whole product.
Quote published by a long-term rental inspection vendor as an account of the operational problem. Reproduced here as evidence of the category problem, not as a RapidEye customer reference. RapidEye has no long-term rental deployments to date.
Guided, step by step, on their own schedule, from a phone they already own. No staff member drives out. No calendar negotiation. Nobody enters someone's home to check on a hallway scuff.
Tenant view, illustrative.
A photo captures what a template thought to ask for. Video captures the room, including the corner nobody wrote a prompt for. It also captures continuity: the walk from the hallway into the kitchen, with nothing edited out between them.
Video has been off the table for tenant-performed inspections everywhere else, and the reason is not the camera. It is that nobody can afford to sit and watch a six-minute walkthrough for every unit.
This is the one that is ours. Damage separated from normal wear, judged against that unit's own move-in baseline, with timestamped evidence attached to every finding. Your team opens a result and makes a decision, instead of opening a submission and doing the work that produces one.
Every other inspection tool hands you a report to read.
41 photos land in a queue. A manager opens each one, remembers what the unit looked like a year ago, and guesses at wear versus damage. Every unit costs the same attention.
Three findings, each tied to a moment in the walkthrough and to how that surface looked at move-in. Attention goes only where a decision is needed.
The incoming tenant records the first walkthrough. That recording becomes the reference every later inspection of this unit is measured against.
TenantMid-lease, pre-move-out, move-out or one-off. Set it once per unit or per portfolio and the requests go out on their own.
You, onceA guided walkthrough, room by room, whenever suits them. Uploads survive bad wifi and pick back up where they stopped.
TenantFindings, severity, and the moment in the video each one came from, already separated from normal wear. Approve, dispute or dispatch.
YouThe honest answer is that participation is a design problem, and it is the part of this category that is already solved. Tenants take it on when it is easier than the alternative, and the alternative is letting a stranger into their home on a weekday.
A tenant recording is not a weaker inspection, it is a wider one, and it comes with something a staff visit usually lacks: a matching recording of the same unit from the day the lease started.
Every inspection product in long-term rental sits in one of these three columns. The difference that matters is not what captures the unit. It is who does the judging.
| Staff-performed Field inspector tools built for your team | Tenant capture, human review The tenant shoots it, your manager reviews it | Tenant capture, AI review RapidEye | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who goes to the property | A member of your team | Nobody | Nobody |
| What gets captured | Photos and video, staff-shot | Photos from a prompted checklist | A continuous video walkthrough |
| Who decides wear versus damage | The inspector on site | A manager, on every submission | Done before it reaches your team |
| Compared against | A checklist and someone's memory | Prior photos, read side by side by a person | That unit's own move-in baseline |
| Cost of the next 100 doors | Site visits and headcount | Review hours, which grow with the portfolio | The same Friday you already have |
| Where the bottleneck lands | Scheduling and drive time | The review queue | Only the units that need a decision |
We are the newcomer in this vertical, so this compares operating models rather than named products. If you are already running one of the tenant capture platforms, the comparison worth having is about your review hours, and that is a ten minute conversation.
Bring a portfolio and a Friday morning queue. We will walk through what changes.
Book a demo